onsdag 18. april 2007

Super-short version of what happened

Fred9/11 Researchers.com svarer 17/4 en nybegynner som nettopp har sett en av videoene hans på YouTube:
The Bush Administration and their backers in the Oil and Defense industries wanted to have a big war and take over the Middle East before China or Russia or Iran would do it. But, to do that, they needed an excuse.

The Neocons at the Project for a New American Century thinktank put out a document called "Rebuiling America's Defenses" which said it would be hard to get people to vote for more $$$ for the military without some kind of Pearl Harbor event. So the Bush gang collaborated with their buddies in the Arab world (yes, Bush family and Bin Laden family are old friends) and used allied military henchmen to blow up the World Trade Center (probably using the latest high-tech weapons). In order to make it look like a foreign attack, they aired fake "plane crash" videos on TV, and then announced that the whole thing was done by Osama Bin Laden who lives in a cave in Afghanistan. The whole Afghanistan invasion and Iraq war had already been planned in advance.

Then, after invading Afghanistan, they just made up the whole Iraq WMD threat out of thin air, even though Iraq was no danger to anyone.

They used the 9/11 event which they themselves staged to totally gut the Bill of Rights and justify wiretapping, torture, all kinds of crazy stuff that they have done since.

It's a very big scam, but it's falling apart on them. Check out 911researchers.com and killtown.blogspot.com or and 911closeup.com and covertoperations.blogspot.com for the latest new research. There is a fake "Truth Movement" which is unfortunately working for the bad guys which wants to hide the media's role in the attacks, so if you talk about "no planes hitting the towers" you'll get a lot of people yelling at you, but that's OK.

Don't worry. You're not alone. It's not bad at all at the bottom of the rabbit hole. It's a little shocking at first, but this sort of thing has happened before, and we'll get through it. If you want to learn more about the exotic weaponry used on 9/11 check out janedoe0911.tripod.com or 911bloglines.com and visit the Air Force Directed Energy Directorate.

4 kommentarer:

Odd Inge sa...

Støtter du teorien om at ingen fly traff WTC 1 & 2?

Med vennlig hilsen

Odd Inge
Ubesvarte Spørsmål
http://www.vgb.no/14296/

iWood sa...

Det er problemer med den offisielle forklaringen som går ut på at en tynn hinne av aluminium skjærer gjennom tykke stålbjelker i tårnene. For å si det enkelt: Dette blir som om smøret ditt en dag skulle få smørkniven til å gi etter, selv om smøret er mykere enn kniven.

Odd Inge sa...

Det er vel det minste problemet du bør tenke på!!!

Er så vanvittig mye mer en bør fokusere på hvis vi skal klare å avsløre at 9/11 er en inside job. Skal vi få til en ny uavhengig etterforskning må vi spre god informasjon.

Bør vi ikke legge bak oss "no plane" teorien?

Med vennlig hilsen

Odd Inge
Ubesvarte Spørsmål
http://www.vgb.no/14296/

iWood sa...

Ikke om den er korrekt. Hvordan tror du flyene kom seg inn i tårnene? Du må jo ha en eller annen teori om at det er piece of cake for et fly å trenge inn i en stålbasert skyskraper. At dette ikke byr på noe problem for en Boeing.